Every boardroom is talking about AI.

And adoption is no longer the problem.

McKinsey says 9 in 10 companies now use AI.

80% say it improves productivity.

But the financial result looks very different.

• Only 37% report any positive EBIT impact.

• Just 6% qualify as AI high performers.

So what are the 6% doing differently?

Here are 🔟 must-knows from McKinsey’s AI Survey:

1️⃣ AI is already mainstream

• Nearly 89% use AI in at least one business function.

• Enterprise-wide scaling rose to 44% from 38%.

2️⃣ Large companies are pulling ahead

Read more

Shipping lines already control the ships.

Now they are buying more of the terminals those ships use.

• CMA CGM invested $2.5bn in terminals, with 66 in its portfolio.

• MSC’s TiL agreed $1.4bn for 49% of Vizhinjam.

• Hapag-Lloyd agreed to acquire 25% of Maasvlakte II.

Yet Hapag-Lloyd will not operate the terminal.

So this is not simply about owning ports.

What are carriers actually buying?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ Sometimes they are buying access — not control

Hapag-Lloyd agreed to acquire 25% of Maasvlakte II.

APM Terminals will keep operational control.

The deal secures long-term capacity at a key Gemini hub.

💡 A minority stake can secure strategic access without running the terminal.

2️⃣ Terminal equity can release capital

Read more

Yesterday, Vincent Clerc invited a group of journalists to Maersk’s HQ.

One message stood out:

Maersk is rethinking Ocean.

For years, it tried to reduce exposure to freight volatility.

Now Clerc says shipping’s economics have changed.

Maersk needs more ships.

Yet he also says there are already too many ships.

That tension could define the next cycle.

So what is Maersk seeing that the market may be missing?

Here are 🔟 must-knows:

1️⃣ Shipping is being priced differently

“Since Covid, the way shipping is priced has fundamentally changed,”

💡Maersk’s Q2 avg. freight rate rose 22%, while volumes grew just 4.1%.

2️⃣ Clerc sees a higher floor for rates

Read more

You book with one shipping line.

Another carrier may operate the ship.

A competitor may provide part of the space.

The route may depend on companies you never chose.

On Far East–Europe, alliances operate 73% of capacity.

MSC operates another 21% on its own.

That can affect your route, reliability and risk.

So who really controls what behind your booking?

Here are 5️⃣ things you need to know:

1️⃣ An alliance is not one company

There are three major alliances today.

Read more

A global carrier never stops.

Bookings arrive.

Prices move.

Ships reroute.

Fuel costs change.

No CEO can watch every decision.

AI increasingly can.

And this is no longer pure theory.

NetDragon is a Hong Kong-listed gaming and education group.

In 2022, it named AI executive Tang Yu as rotating CEO of a subsidiary.

So what if AI ran a shipping company?

Here are 5️⃣ CEO decisions to test:

1️⃣ Let AI price the cargo

This is already happening.

Read more

Shippers are paying more.

Their service is getting worse.

And cargo growth is modest.

• Far East–US East Coast spot rates are almost $11,000/FEU.

• Far East–North America on-time performance fell below 20%.

• North American imports grew just 1% in H1.

Those three numbers should not fit together.

But they do.

And the reason may tell us what rates do next.

So what is driving the gap?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ The gap is getting wider

Far East–US East Coast spot rates reached $10,900/FEU.

That is about 10% above the 2024 Red Sea crisis peak.

Read more

Global shipping depends on a few narrow routes.

Two of them are tightening at the same time.

• Hormuz is down to about 10 commodity ships a day.

• Panama is cutting daily transit slots from 36 to 32.

One problem is war.

The other is water.

Neither chokepoint is fully closed.

Yet the network is already losing flexibility.

That matters before the next disruption even arrives.

So what happens when both tighten together?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ Hormuz does not need to close

Commodity transits now average about 10 a day.

That is the lowest level since May.

Read more

Nuclear-powered ships have been discussed for decades.

Now Maersk is testing the idea on a real trade lane.

Lloyd’s Register is involved.

So are two major container ports.

The route is Charleston ↔ Felixstowe.

But no nuclear ship has been ordered.

No launch date exists.

And that is what makes this interesting.

Something has changed before the ship even exists.

So what is really being tested — and why could it matter for shipping?

Here are the 🔟 things you need to know — without the noise.

1️⃣ It starts with one real route

The project connects Charleston and Felixstowe.

Maersk and Lloyd’s Register are part of it.

Read more

At Maritime Analytica, we never read one number alone.

Freight can fall.

Charters can rise.

Ship values can stay high.

All at the same time.

That is not a contradiction.

Each market is telling us something different.

Read them in the right order.

And the picture becomes much clearer.

Here is the framework we use:

1️⃣ Start with freight

Read more

Together, they capture how the container shipping landscape is evolving — and why it matters for decision-makers.

Written for executives who prefer context over noise.

For decades, shipping competed through scale.

• Bigger ships.

• Bigger fleets.

• Lower unit costs.

• Scale still matters.

But competitors can increasingly buy similar assets.

The harder advantage may be what you do with them.

So where could the next edge come from?

Here are 5️⃣ shifts worth watching:

1️⃣ AI is moving into operations

AI is moving beyond chatbots.

Read more

Carriers had the same strong Q2 tailwind.

Freight rates rose.

Demand held up.

Average container-shipping operating margin reached 11.2%.

But one carrier reached 26%.

Another made just 1.7%.

Maersk Ocean moved from -2.3% to 8.9% in one quarter.

Same freight cycle.

Very different results.

So what actually decides who makes the most money?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind the gap:

1️⃣ Trade mix changes the result

ZIM’s total Q2 volume grew just 3%.

But its Pacific volume rose from 354K to 426K TEU.

Read more

Freight rates are one of the most watched numbers in shipping.

But watching the rate itself can be too late.

For anyone exposed to rates, timing matters.

When to lock. When to negotiate. When to wait.

The challenge is knowing which signals move first.

So what should you watch?

And what is each signal telling you?

Here are 5️⃣ signals to watch before freight rates move:

1️⃣ Watch where cargo is growing

Global demand matters.

But rates are set trade by trade.

Read more

Disruption should hurt container trade.

Routes get longer.

Costs go up.

Supply chains get less efficient.

Yet the world’s Top 100 ports handled ~790m TEU in 2025.

That was 6.3% more than a year earlier.

Global container trade also kept growing in H1 2026.

So why are more containers moving through a less efficient system?

And is all that growth really new demand?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ Cargo often moves somewhere else

Read more

Ocean freight is starting to ease.

• Drewry’s WCI fell 1% to $4,473 per 40ft.

• Shanghai–Rotterdam fell 3%.

• Shanghai–Genoa fell 2%.

That should reduce shipping costs.

But many other charges do not move with the spot rate.

Fuel has its own price.

Storage has its own clock.

Insurance follows risk.

Inland transport follows a different market.

So when ocean rates fall, how much of the saving actually reaches the final logistics bill?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ The spot rate is only one price

The WCI is moving lower.

But a freight invoice has more than ocean freight.

Read more

Port congestion just crossed a number few expected to see again.

Last week, more than 4.25m TEU was waiting to berth.

The Covid peak was ~4.0m TEU.

That sounds worse than 2022.

But today’s global fleet is much bigger.

And this week, congestion has already eased to 3.8m TEU.

So is today’s congestion really worse than Covid?

Or does the headline hide a different capacity problem?

For rates and vessel availability, the difference matters.

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ The absolute record is real

Read more

Freight rates should be falling.

The fleet is bigger.

Peak season is fading.

And Suez is starting to reopen.

But the market is not moving in one direction.

• The WCI fell 1% last week.

• The SCFI rose 2.9%.

Panama is tightening as carriers blank sailings.

So does Q4 finally bring lower rates?

Or does the market stay tighter than expected?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ Rates are already moving in different directions

The WCI fell 1% to $4,473.

Read more

Europe’s container trade is growing.

Volumes rose 3.8% in H1 2026.

That looks healthy.

But the growth is becoming much more one-sided.

More cargo is arriving.

Less is leaving.

That matters because ships and containers still need to move both ways.

And when the balance changes, the capacity needed to move that trade can change too.

So what is driving Europe’s growing trade imbalance?

And how much does it really matter for shipping?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind the shift:

1️⃣ Imports are driving Europe’s growth

Read more

Together, they capture how the container shipping landscape is evolving — and why it matters for decision-makers.

Written for executives who prefer context over noise.

CMA CGM just signed a global MOU with China’s CCCC.

At first, it looks like a port deal.

CCCC builds ports, roads, railways and major infrastructure.

It ranked No. 4 globally among international contractors in 2025.

CMA CGM is also moving deeper inland.

Now the two strategies meet.

How far could this go?

Here are 5️⃣ signals behind it:

1️⃣ The gateway footprint is getting bigger

CMA CGM invested $2.5bn in terminals in 2025.

It now has 66 terminals across 40 countries.

With RSGT, $434m is going into a new 2.6m-TEU Jeddah terminal.

It now fully owns Santos Brasil.

That includes South America’s largest container terminal.

Khalifa Terminal in Abu Dhabi is expanding to 2.7m TEU.

It is also taking 20% of Eurogate Hamburg.

Capacity there is planned to reach 6m TEU.

💡 CMA CGM is building more control around its global gateways.

2️⃣ CMA CGM is moving inland

CMA CGM acquired Freightliner UK.

It is one of Britain’s leading rail freight operators.

That added rail, road and inland terminals.

It also bought 35% of Egypt’s October Dry Port.

The hub is directly linked to rail.

Its CEVA logistics arm adds around 1,500 logistics sites in 170 countries.

💡 CMA CGM is gaining more control after cargo leaves the port.

3️⃣ CCCC changes what is possible

CCCC is one of China’s biggest infrastructure groups.

• It won around $55bn of overseas contracts in 2025.

• Asia and Africa made up 76%.

• Ports were only 7%.

Roads, bridges and rail were much bigger.

The new MOU also covers dry ports and logistics corridors.

💡 CCCC can build much more than the terminal itself.

4️⃣ The model already exists

CCCC subsidiary CHEC already works with CMA CGM.

They are partners at Kribi and Lekki.

Now that model could spread much further.

• Africa.

• Asia.

• The Middle East.

• Latin America.

CEVA could also move cargo for CCCC projects.

💡 CCCC can build the gateway; CMA CGM can connect the cargo.

5️⃣ There is capital behind it

Stonepeak invested $2.4bn in CMA CGM’s terminal platform.

Another $3.6bn could follow.

CMA CGM keeps 75% ownership and full operational control.

CCCC adds the construction capability.

💡 That could let CMA CGM expand faster without carrying the full capital and construction burden alone.

🧭 Maritime Analytica View

This is still an MOU.

No project pipeline has been announced.

But look at the wider race.

APM Terminals already operates 60 terminals in 34 countries.

MSC has invested in 100+ terminals, while MEDLOG operates across 90+ countries.

Hapag-Lloyd wants to grow from 21 terminals to over 30 by 2030.

So the move ashore is already industry-wide.

CMA CGM’s model could take a different shape.

• Stonepeak brings capital.

• CCCC brings construction.

• CMA CGM and CEVA bring cargo, operations and logistics.

That could make the model easier to scale.

For years, the big question was who had the ships.

The next may be who controls the infrastructure around them.

More than 13m TEU of ship capacity is already on order.

Ports and inland networks take much longer to expand.

That could shift scarcity from ships to gateways and corridors.

The key question: can CMA CGM build corridor control faster than its rivals?