🔥CMA CGM’s $2B+ Mega Order: China vs. S. Korea—Who Will Win the Shipyard Race?

🌍LNG, shipyard politics, and CMA-CGM $2B Strategy—explained.

🎖️Subscribe /✨Sponsorship /📊Exclusive Report /🙏Rate us /🎁Send Gift

🔥Greetings, Maritime Mavericks!

As the world worried about chokepoints and carbon targets, CMA CGM CEO Rodolphe Saadé made a smart move that could shift the future of container shipping.

Behind closed doors, CMA-CGM is negotiating a $2.2 billion ship order for up to 12 dual-fuel LNG-powered giants—each between 20,000 and 24,000 TEU.

But this isn’t about fleet growth. It’s a calculated, geopolitical maneuver.

🔻One week ago, he was in Washington pledging U.S. shipbuilding to dodge Chinese sanctions.

🔺Now? He’s in a bidding war between China’s Hudong-Zhonghua and South Korea’s Samsung and Hanwha—each desperate for yard slots in 2028–2029.

This is not a ship deal.

It’s a 2030 positioning strategy disguised as a procurement round.

---

🧭 What Makes This Order So Critical?

• 💸 Each ship may cost $180M–$220M, depending on yard and spec. The total order could top $2.2B.

• 🌎 Yard slots are tight globally until 2029. Securing these now blocks rivals from scaling.

• 🧯 Fuel strategy: While Maersk backs methanol, CMA-CGM is doubling down on LNG—more scalable, cheaper, and compliant today.

• ⚠️ Political risk: 34.5% of CMA CGM’s current fleet is China-built. U.S. law could fine $1M per port call starting 2026.

---

⁉️Here Are 10 Strategic Questions

• Why is CMA-CGM betting on LNG over methanol?

• What’s the risk of choosing Chinese yards again?

• Why are Korean shipbuilders more attractive?

• Will CMA-CGM split the order?

• Could this trigger overcapacity?

• Can the U.S. yards realistically deliver?

• How are rivals reacting?

• Could this deal collapse over politics?

• What role does financing play here?

• What’s the real long-term play here?

Let’s break them down — one strategic play at a time.

www.cma-cgm.com

❓ Why is CMA-CGM betting on LNG over methanol?
🌿 LNG is proven, globally bunkered, and compatible with bio-LNG. It delivers CO₂ reductions now, not hypothetically in 2032.

❓ What’s the risk of choosing Chinese yards again?