š„ONE Line on Q2 2025: Growth Without Profitability!
šVolumes rise, but falling freight rates and cost pressures squeeze margins.
šļøSubscribe /āØSponsorship /šExclusive Reports /šRate us /šSend Gift
š„Greetings, Maritime Mavericks!
Global container shipping is facing falling spot rates, tariff-driven volatility, and rising cost pressures.
From tariff shocks to freight collapses and Cape re-routings, Q2 has been one of the most turbulent periods for container shipping in recent years.
ONE Lineās results reveal an industry under pressure ā yet adapting fast through strategic fleet deployment, flexible cost controls, and operational resilience.
We review ONE Lineās Q2 Performance in 10 different perspectives:
ONEās Modest Profit Amid Margin Squeezes
Revenue Gap Widens vs. Leaders
Tariff Volatility Disrupts Transpacific Trades
Freight Rates Collapse on Asia-Europe Lanes
Liftings Up, Utilization Down
Cape Rerouting Escalates Operational Costs
ONEās Fuel Advantage Partially Neutralized
Port Congestion & Labor Shortages Hit Reliability
Fleet Expansion Amid Weakening Rates
FY2025 Outlook Slashed
and
š Big Picture
Letās dive inā¦
1. ONEās Modest Profit Amid Margin Squeezes
š”ONE posted a $90M net profit with an EBITDA margin of 15%, far behind COSCO (27%) and ZIM (29%).
š Maritime Analytica Insight: āONEās thinner margins show weaker pricing power and higher cost exposure compared to peers ā highlighting a need for better yield management.ā
2. Revenue Gap Widens vs. Leaders
š”ONE generated $4.1B revenue, far below Maersk ($13.1B) and CMA CGM ($13.2B), despite higher global liftings (3.2M TEU).
š Maritime Analytica Insight: āThe mismatch between ONEās volume and revenue signals structural underpricing ā ONE moves boxes but struggles to monetize capacity.ā
3. Tariff Volatility Disrupts Transpacific Trades
š”The U.S.āChina 90-day tariff pause temporarily boosted ONEās Transpacific liftings, but freight rates remained under pressure at $1,279/TEU, well below ZIMās $1,479/TEU.
š Maritime Analytica Insight: āONE benefits from volume spikes but fails to capitalize on premium freight; stronger contractual pricing strategies are needed to compete with ZIM.ā